Lucio Franzese

The legal experience highlights the centrality of the auto-composition of the dispute, which was eclipsed by the modern legal thought and which now, however, is stimulated by the same court with the help of lawyers. Indeed, the procedural decision of the dispute, as well as being subsidiary to the attempt to reach amicable agreement of the litigants experienced by the mediator in civil and commercial matters, it is only one pole of the judge’s function who is first called to reconcile the parties...

Globalisation of markets points out inner frailty of modern State, which is built on the principles of the so called «legal geometry»; despite the opposition of traditional juridical science, the epiphany of subsidiary State demonstrates the possibility of an economics, where individualism and statalism disappear, and autonomy of human person is recognised.

In his latest book Il conflitto epidemico, Guido Rossi points out neither self-regulation nor legal order can be regarded as remedies for conflicts of interests, to which recent market failures are related; the review, that draws the philosophical implications of Rossi’s analysis, argues the Author, who isn’t totally free from the prejudices of traditional theories, neverthless considers restoration of morality, and, in larger sense, return to pre-modern-science «unity of knowledges», as possible keys to build a new order of the market.