Il tuo browser non supporta JavaScript!

Kierkegaard and the Ash'arites on reason and theology

digital Kierkegaard and the Ash'arites on reason and theology
Articolo
rivista RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA
fascicolo RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2013 - 3-4
titolo Kierkegaard and the Ash'arites on reason and theology
autore
editore Vita e Pensiero
formato Articolo | Pdf
online da 02-2014
issn 00356247 (stampa) | 18277926 (digitale)
Scrivi un commento per questo prodotto
€ 6,00

Ebook in formato Pdf leggibile su questi device:

Neither the Ashʻarite nor Kierkegaard’s system of theology are anti-rational, for Kierkegaard regards the contradiction present in the object of faith as absolute rather than logical, suggesting thereby the existential dialectics for understanding this contradiction instead of resolving it. The Ashʻarite also hold that one can understand the existence of God through absolute reason, or reason which is not commanded by sharʻ (religion), yet such understanding does not lead to any practical outcome. The anti-rationalism option is thus rejected. The other two options here are supra-rationalism and rationalism. Kierkegaard’s theology is that of suprarationalism while the theology of the Ashʻarite is rationalist. Faith, Kierkegaard says, is not rational because it will be undecided by the abeyance and postponement of philosophical reasoning, by the approximation of historical evidence, and
because of the lack of confidence in the Bible; however, it is not irrational because if the contradiction is present in the understanding of faith rather than in existence it is supra-rational. For the Ashʻarite, however, faith can be made rational and justified through the command and guidance of sharʻ in order to find sound reasoning. Reason has no contribution in Kierkegaard’s theology neither as a sine qua non nor as a sufficient condition. For the Ashʻarite, nonetheless, reason is a sine qua non but not a sufficient condition and is in need of sharʻ. Reason, in Ashʻarite theology, both fails to penetrate into all of the premises of the argument and falls short of binding man to accept its knowledge. It is sharʻ which comes into play in order to help reason both improve its objection and compensate the binding and obligation.

Keywords: reason, theology, Kierkegaard, the Ashʻarite, faith


News

13.07.2020
Ecologia dei nuovi media
Il 16 luglio alle 15.30 online il dialogo tra Fausto Colombo, autore di "Ecologia dei media", e Luca Sofri, direttore del Post.
13.07.2020
Riflessioni sul tempo, d'estate
Per questa pausa estivo vi proponiamo cinque saggi tra filosofia, spiritualità e psicanalisi per riflettere sul tema del tempo.
13.07.2020
Il desiderio sotto le stelle
La sera del 14 luglio nella corte del Castello di Cavernago un dialogo sotto le stelle sul desiderio e altri dis-astri con Silvano Petrosino e Bob Messini.
13.07.2020
L'uomo ama le Maiuscole
Anteprima del nuovo libro del filosofo Silvano Petrosino, "Dove abita l'infinito. Potere, trascendenza e giustizia"

Newsletter

* campi obbligatori

Collane

  • Cultura e storia
  • Filosofia morale
  • Grani di senape
  • Le nuove bussole
  • Metafisica e storia della metafisica
  • Pagine prime
  • Punti
  • Relazioni internazionali e scienza politica.ASERI
  • Sestante
  • Studi interdisciplinari sulla famiglia
  • Temi metafisici e problemi del pensiero antico
  • Transizioni
  • Varia. Saggistica
  • Scopri le altre Collane